Takeaways from February's Borough Council Meeting

Community Climate Initiative
Superintendent Tom Strickler said the district wants to get a handle on issues and develop an action plan.

School District Superintendent Tom Strickler and Dr. Gregory McGough, director of curriculum, explained the Community Climate Initiative and presented a “climate survey.” Strickler said there have been problems with students after school and the district wants to get a handle on the issue and develop an action plan. The Pennsylvania Department of Education and IU13 are helping the district’s initiative.

Dr. Gregory McGough laid out the stages of the process.

McGough said that one of the first steps is to create a vision of what we all see the school as. He said the process began with preparation and planning at the school level, and we are now at Stage 2: Delivering assessments to all stakeholders. Stage 3 will be to understand the findings and develop an action plan. Next will be the implementation phase, working with short, defined goals. The final step will be to reevaluate and start the process over.

Programs and Funding

Mayor Leo Lutz mentioned Manos House and Benchmark Programs to help with problems with youth in the community. He said the programs can’t be possible or sustainable if the borough has to solicit funds to pay for them.

“This is a community problem, this is a problem we must address. We need to fund these programs so that they’re sustainable,” he said. “We can put lights in the downtown, but that’s not going to help these kids.”

He said the challenge is trying to find grant money and getting organizations to donate. “We will not arrest our way out of these problems,” he said.

Our Home of Hope

Our Home of Hope received a $10,000 donation from council.

Council considered a donation request from Our Home of Hope for $30,000 to defray costs of facility repairs /renovations and operations at the 223-225 Cherry Street facility but in the end approved a donation of $10,000.

208-210 Locust Street

Council donated the former Bigler property at 208-210 Locust to the Lancaster County Land Bank.
Council voted to donate the 208-210 Locust Street to the Lancaster County Land Bank Authority.  At its November 2017 meeting, council approved $70,000 for the Lancaster County Land Bank to assist Brookline, a historic preservation company, with restoration of the property. Brookline’s budget for the project is $232,000. According to the agreement, the company will purchase the building for the token fee of $1 with the intent of restoring the facade and performing structural repairs. Brookline will then move its sister company, Lancaster Lime Works LLC, into the building.

MORE INFO HERE.

Funding for Study to Relocate Borough Offices

Council authorized an application to the Municipal Assistance Program. The program covers half the cost of a study the borough is undertaking to consider possible relocation of the borough offices and police station from its current location to other sites in the borough, one of which is the school district’s administration center building at 200 North Fifth Street.

One-Way Streets
The borough approved the following one-way streets to accommodate traffic calming methods and new parking areas and to address a safety issue:

*Rotary Ave (Front to Commerce Street: East)
* Commerce Street (Rotary Ave to Walnut Street: South)
* Tenth Street (Ironville Pike to Spruce Street: South)
* Bethel Street (Ridge to Locust traveling North) changed to (Locust to Cherry traveling South).

Quick Ticket Complaints

Residents voiced concerns about quick ticket citations.

Borough Manager Greg Sahd said there were 70 snow code quick tickets issued on one day in January. He said that a resident who posts a $100 fee for a hearing will have the amount returned “probably net of the fine” at the hearing.

Resident Gerald Maurer said the borough should exercise discretion on citations.

A resident argued that the borough should exercise discretion when citing residents for a small amount of snow on the sidewalk. Officials said that any amount of snow can be considered unsafe.

Councilwoman FitzGerald said that she received a quick ticket for snow as well and paid it.

Another resident said he received a quick ticket regarding his trash bag being out for pickup without being placed in a trash receptacle.

A landlord asked for a meeting with the borough manager and the code manager. He expressed concern about something said to him although he did not give details publicly. He said he was frustrated with the lack of response from borough officials.

0 thoughts on “Takeaways from February's Borough Council Meeting”

  1. WHAT? Where did you read that you could not use trash bags? You're right that would be a complete lack of common sense. However, what the ordinance says is that your trash bags must be placed in a receptacle with a lid. The reason being that an animal or person could rip the bag open overnight, causing trash all over the street and sidewalk. Understand now?

    Like

  2. You folks have to be some of the most ignorant and uneducated idiots around. Learn how to form a sentence, use punctuation and spell before you spout off your moronic comments.

    Like

  3. GEEZ!!!! Must make a correction: NOT all borough officials live in Columbia Borough. Do not lie to others. The code enforcement manager, the borough manager, the assistant borough manager, the public works director, the finance/human resource manager, the executive director of the CEDC and most of the police force do NOT live in the borough. If you say it's the law then apparently there are some problems here.

    Like

  4. I'm amazed at the demeaning tone being​ used in some of the reply comments, only a Republican would resort to condescending name calling. Next you'll be “tweeting.”

    Like

  5. It's really to be in a container with a lid to deter animals, but in Columbia many people act like animals. So I'm not surprised you used the human as example, you took the bait.

    Like

  6. But at least we see how they really feel about the people in this town. It's absolutely disgusting. They shouldn't be allowed to run a lemonade stand, lest a town. Give some yokel a tiny little bit of power/authority in a tiny little town and they think they're the f'ing pope. Maybe some year this state will wake up and get rid of these municipalities in favor of county governments. It isn't 1750 anymore.

    Like

  7. It's not that they are good enough,they are suppost to do things for the good of the town , not just a few pet prodjects.( like the river park)

    Like

  8. As far as the school Dr McGough ring around the words, just hold everyone responsible for there own actions, don't let the kids run the show.

    Like

  9. I paid my ticket also. My point was not one Borough Official in the the Council Chambers that night seemed to grasp the concept of discretion when evaluating whether or not a ticket should be written. Maybe they should all do some research on the use of discretion by officials empowered to “ticket” Columbia citizens. It's my bet someone from the top said “any amount of snow that day, write 'em up.”

    Like

  10. Why don't more people come to the council meeting and speak up about the spending etc the council people do with our money. It is a shame to move the municipal building too that's a beautiful building in the center of our town. We never had so many employees before why now? It would be nice to fill the room on a meeting night.

    Like

  11. Dr McGough is one of those that tells any one who listens,what he is gone to tell you,then he tells you,then he tells you what he told you,by that time you don't realy care and just want him to sit down and go to the next person…

    Like

  12. This is not about whether someone is “good enough” or qualified to work in this borough. It has everything to do with them living here and paying taxes here. If Columbia is so great, why aren't these borough workers relocating to Columbia. Buy a house here and help pay for all of the projects. Help pay for the education of Columbia's young people.

    Like

  13. when citizen comment came up to hire rebbeca dellinger they already vote her in.It was brought up right after that and it was said owell buy council members.

    Like

  14. amen if these kids are going to act like animals they must be treated like that. When they aren't in school any more they won't be coddeled ,so way now?????

    Like

  15. It is the responsibility of the landlord to supply trash toters or a dumpster for their tenants to place their trash bags in.

    Like

  16. she has all the say and don't live in Columbia she is the borough manager in training. These jobs are never advertised how do they get people?

    Like

  17. On the relocation of the borough office. Many companies are now having their employees work from home equipped with all necessities of business such as laptop and printer. Why have the four Code Enforcement be in attendance every day of the week. The Codes Manager can have a weekly meeting and have his managing control of his codes officers.How much time is wasted inside the office? Work orders can be transmitted via email or phone. This is how you manage office space without interruption of downtown business.Citizens rely on convenient locations.

    Like

  18. that is a great idea but it would never pass in this borough. Might be a better use of time also. I still feel with all the people in our town jobs could be filled. Give jobs to people who pay taxes here.

    Like

  19. where is the respect that used to be in this town? RESPECT your neighbors,elders,and everyone,just to get along.Hold people young and old accountable or hit them in there wallets,or parents wallets. That's how it used to be. When the mayor gets rocks thrown at him and his truck that should tell you something. Start arresting these people and word will get out that the town is not going to stand for these actions any more……

    Like

Leave a comment