$94K plus bennies for Strickler

Tom Strickler, the newly appointed Director of Operations for Columbia Borough School District will receive a salary of $94,000 plus the equivalent of $30,000 in benefits for his year-long contract, according to ELANCO Superintendent Dr. Robert Hollister.  The remainder of the $165,000 that Columbia is putting up will be deposited into ELANCO’s general fund.

A press contingent from Columbia news, views & reviews and Columbia Spy, as well as a Columbia resident, attended Monday’s ELANCO School Board meeting and spoke with Dr. Hollister after the meeting. The Columbia resident had requested to comment during the meeting but was denied because he was not an ELANCO resident. The board president denied him the right to speak, even though he had not yet identified himself as a non-resident.

Hollister explained that 10 people applied for the director’s position. Five were winnowed from the original pool, and three finalists were further interviewed, from which Strickler was chosen. Hollister declined to give the names of the other applicants.

Although he is technically an ELANCO employee, Strickler will run the day-to-day operations at Columbia.  Hollister will come to Columbia one day a week to oversee the operation. Asked why he would do so without financial compensation, Hollister replied, “I have an affinity for Columbia.” He added that he knows people from town. He said he believes the shared services agreement will give Columbia “better service at less cost.”

Hollister said he is the most transparent superintendent in the county and guarantees that Strickler will be “open and approachable.” Hollister added that he will attend this Thursday’s’s regular meeting of the Columbia School Board. Strickler is also expected to attend.

Director of Operations Summary of Responsibilities
Source: LNP

ELANCO’s job posting for the position

0 thoughts on “$94K plus bennies for Strickler”

  1. Thank you for correcting the board meeting date to 8/18. Guess being so about this bogus agreement caused my mistake. My wish would be that the vote by 6 board members could be corrected so easily.

    Like

  2. Hope to see standing room only Thursday at Strickler Hall. They should be holding these board meetings in the school cafeteria anyhow. There was reason to spend the tax payers money on all that unneeded décor and equipment they have in Strickler Hall. As we see most of the voting is done behind doors anyhow. Keep raising taxes and driving the elders into foreclosure. Let's remember the elders are the ones that been footing the bill. Who will foot the bill when they can't? My children graduated from Columbia and moved out of Columbia when they had children. Now they have other opportunities that Columbia don't offer and they could afford a larger and nicer home because the SCHOOL TAXES were considerably less. DO WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE NOT WHAT IS RIGHT FOR YOU!

    Like

  3. Who is making the signs? Who is contacting Mike Straub, Reporter for WGAL On Your Side(his Mother-in-law is retired Columbia High School Principal Virginia Babic)? Here is his email address- mstraub@hearst.com

    Like

  4. Dr. Hollister is the CBSD's superintendent. I understand that he was not returning calls, so why not go to the meeting, he is representing our district?You say run for office, take example for how the position played out for Mr. Resch's replacement. There was an Hispanic women that interviewed for the position and I heard highly qualified for the position. Who was picked? Mr. Combs, a previous board member who resigned during his term. The boys already had their man in play so he could help out with the votes. No chance for the female, first-timer that wanted the position. Rotten fish in the water, again!!!Yes, you could move, if you can sell your house. People are not flooding into Columbia. House prices are down due to high taxes. Please say to stay away from Columbia because of high taxes!!! To get out of Columbia, homeowner are loosing major bucks just to unload them to the investment market and landlords. No wonder more and more landlords are willing to offer section 8 rentals. Now, I understand why.

    Like

  5. We must remember that our goal is to attack and end the agreement with Elanco. If we eliminate the agreement, then the two main personalities involved become yesterday's news. Potential lawsuits can be discarded and people in Columbia can agree to work together to improve our schools and our image.

    Like

  6. My questions. Who came up with this idea in the first place?Why Elanco? Were other districts contacted to see if they were interested such as Donegal, Hempfield etc? If not, why not? Other big ticket expenditures need to be put out on bid. Was this.I cannot attend the meeting. I hope someone asks.

    Like

  7. ELANCO people aren't going to bother driving up here. The distance between these schools alone is enough to say there's something wrong here.

    Like

  8. If 6 board members can sell the soul of our prideful district for a savings of $8000, then maybe someone should offer them $8001 to end this agreement NOW.

    Like

  9. I checked the minutes from prior meetings and apparently this is routine for the board to allow this man to pray during citizen comments. This time should be allowed for comments not prayers.

    Like

  10. The motion that was made bypassing the vice president when Strickler resigned should be looked at very closely. When asked why that was done, the answer was that it was a board decision. When? Before the meeting when the motion was made?

    Like

  11. Oh yes I agree with the end result of what you're saying. Call it “stacked the deck”, “strong armed”, “blackmail”, “manipulation”, “coercion”, etc. It's all the same in the end. The decision was made and the documents created around specific school board members to help them gain the jobs they wanted. Nothing to do with what was best for students or taxpayers or even who was the best candidate.

    Like

  12. So of anybody has read the document, surely you have questions. I understand wanting to share the services of the superintendent to save some money. However, it should have stopped there. We should not have given away any authority to hire the person who is treated and will be acting as a CBSD employee. Nor should that person have a hiring capability. According to the documents, the DOO is basically acting as the superintendent, in the superintendents absence. So why isn't the DOO job description and responsibilities more resemblant of a superintendent instead of a “social worker”?

    Like

  13. A social worker's job description includes much more than the one proposed for Strickler. Don't insult the social workers who actually work to better people's lives.

    Like

  14. I would like to know the credentials of the other candidates. If they had backgrounds in education and public administration and were not selected, the appointment was a set up. Also, I pity the citizen that travelled to New Holland and could not speak. So,in conclusion, Stickler gets his way,a citizen can not speak since they did not ask before the meeting, and ELANCO, pockets the leftover $30,000. It stinks!

    Like

  15. The district was paying about $115,000 for a superintendent that left suddenly. She had a background in education and now we are paying 94,000 salary plus 30,000 in benefits to somebody with NO background in education. Sounds like a setup.

    Like

  16. If Columbia is in this pilot project why can't we speak at ELANCO's meetings? Strickler is clearly employed by ELANCO and working in Columbia so if we speak out at Columbia's meetings will our concerns make it back to ELANCO's board? Yet another slap in the face for taxpayers of this borough.

    Like

  17. Hollister is coming to cut jobs and make the bottom line look like he is saving the district money, which it could do, but at who's expense? All those loving the idea, watch your back.

    Like

  18. Curiously, this notice for a “director of operations” position lists these requirements: Interested and qualified applicants can apply through the district application portal at https://neshaminypa.tedk12.com/hire/index.aspx. Please include a letter of interest, resume, three letters of professional reference and required clearances (PA Criminal Record check; FBI Clearance (Registration number) and PA Child Abuse clearance). Applications are accepted through August 30, 2016 or until position is filled.And gives a much longer application period. And is advertised to a broader audience. And required the requisite clearances! And does not require a “matchbook advanced degree.”http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Neshaminy-School-District/jobs/Director-Operation-8f0b723e7050b474?q=director+of+operations

    Like

  19. Just like in industry. He is a headhunter. Cut staff and it is at the expense of the students. True, we may be top heavy with administration, being he starts to cut teachers,that is bad.Going to be an interesting year with Hollister at Garden Spot and a person who created a position at Columbia. Maybe one of job cuts will be director of operations, if cuts are in the future.

    Like

  20. Correction, CBSD is paying a total of $165,000 for this mess. Just look over the last two years how many administrators left the district and how Mr. Rhoads was downgraded from his position as CHS Dean/Athletic Director, now back in the classroom, teaching Ecology. That leaves Mrs. Maura Hobson with 400 students to administer and 35 teachers to evaluate and observe – without a Dean of Students. So are we saving money??????????Then the district hires Anthony Sottasante as District Wide Director of Extra-Curricular Activities, a 12 month part time Average 25 hours per week to handle Mr. Rhoads' Athletic Director position. Mr. Rhoads salary was cut approx. $20,000 but then increased the new Extra Curr. Act. position by $5,000. Managing all the ex-curr. positions, can he do it in 25 hours per week, probably not!!I predict you will see staff in the Columbia Borough School District look for jobs elsewhere or resigned for early retirement. They see the writing on the wall….

    Like

  21. When we are giving them $160,000 for that position, yes we are paying for it. On top of that, they are putting the leftover $30,000 into their general fund,why not give it back to Columbia. Also, since job is new, why not start at the low end of salary, $85,000, not $94,000. I can also see Mr.Strickler asking for an assistant, saying job is too much.If that happens, who pays. I believe they(ELANCO and Strickler) have the taxpayers of Columbia.

    Like

  22. WHAT are you thinking???????? Columbia taxpayers are most certainly paying the contracted amount of $165,000. The “benefits” are paid by ELANCO and they get to call ALL the shots. How's that for a deal?

    Like

  23. How can one talk with pride about cutting jobs. Granted it may happen, but when I knew I had to tell good employees that I had to lay them off, many times just temporarily due to order demands, I could not sleep the night before or day or 2 afterwards.You harm families when this occurs.It should be the last resort.

    Like

  24. Not only are we paying for the service which Elanco oversees, but sounds like we are powerless and have no voice in the decision making process. The elanco board and their staff made the decision and residents and their representatives from cokumbia had no input into the decision and are not allowed to speak at the elanco meetings. The denial of the right to speak due to not being a elanco resident really shows that in essence elanco has taken over our district. Further more this sounds like this issue is going to get bigger and bigger if furloughing of staff and services is on the table as these decisions will be made independent of the residents of the boro and the their representatives.

    Like

  25. What a mess we are hurting the students and that is the last thing that should be done also it is not good for.the teachers sounds like some of them could lose their jobs all this because someone was given a job that he should not have how can he.sleep.at.night I sure could notI ia and they need tot also whais going to the teat

    Like

  26. Anyone else curious as to WHY they wont release the names and qualifications of the other applicants?? While “technically” the paycheck will come from ELANCO, the $165k is being paid from Columbia to ELANCO. Do you really think ELANCO is paying Strickler from their own funds???? So our board forced out a superintendent that was showing score growth and reduction of discipline issues, had to buyout her contract, converted the unemployed, volunteer past president into the highest paid person in the district??? Wake up Columbia, we have been played.

    Like

  27. Too bad not all residents have internet access. Cole,you are doing a great job keeping us informed about the school matter. I am sure if more people found out what is happening to our schools,teachers and students, the outcry would be tremendous. Keep up the good work.

    Like

  28. So sorry, the benefits are under ELANCO's umbrella, but included in the $165,000. If I'm wrong on that Cole, please correct.

    Like

  29. I read in the LNP that Strickler worked for the state under Corbett's reign. Was that patronage job, or did he have to go thru the regular application process.

    Like

  30. It was explained something like this: Those applicants that were not chosen would not want their employers to know they were/are out applying for other jobs.

    Like

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply