Tom Strickler dominated the conversation at Thursday night’s Columbia Borough School Board meeting of the whole, even though he wasn’t there. Despite questioning from residents, the board offered no reason for his conspicuous absence.
The Columbia board tiptoed past the issue on Thursday when it discussed the agenda item “Modification of Executive Service Contract date change 8/9/2016” without mentioning Strickler’s name. In fact, his name was not uttered until later in the meeting when resident Frank Doutrich asked a series of pointed questions.
Hollister also was not present at the meeting. Ken Klawitter, who most recently had been Columbia’s acting superintendent, attributed his absence to vacation. He added that Hollister had requested that Klawitter be at the meeting as an advisor. “Even I’m not here officially,” Klawitter said.
Klawitter announced that a $250,000 grant is available for the districts [Columbia and ELANCO] to pilot the new program because – according to Klawitter – they are the first ones legally to do it. He offered scant details about the possibility.
Frank Doutrich asked the amount of the director’s salary, but no one offered a definite answer. Klawitter explained that Columbia Borough is responsible for paying up to $165,000 a year (pro-rated) to ELANCO for a contracted service, out of which Strickler’s salary will be paid. “I’m just astonished that you don’t know what the salary is,” Doutrich later told the board.
Resident Kay Leader asked if Strickler will attend meetings. Board President Cole Knighton replied, “He’ll be here, and I don’t know that I can say anything more than that.”
Leader also said that it appears as if Columbia has lost any control over the issue. “I think you as a board have a lot of work to do in this community to put out a positive feel. To the community it doesn’t look good as far as what your decisions have been and what you have allowed ELANCO to control.”
Knighton downplayed a resident’s perception of negative feelings among community members. He reported hearing positive feedback about the newly created position at a recent golf outing.
Resch asked why Vice President Kathy Hohenadel was passed over for the position of president when Strickler announced his resignation in June – and a second questioner asked why a motion was made to nominate, and subsequently appoint, Knighton as president. “It’s a board decision,” Klawitter said.
Doutrich asked if there was currently a full board and was told one seat remains to be filled. According to Board President Cole Knighton, no one has applied for the seat. “We had that out there for letters to be submitted by August 1. We’ve received zero, so we’re still looking,” Knighton said. Knighton later explained that anyone can apply at the courthouse “and they’re in,” in regard to the open seat. He said the position was advertised on the district website and in LNP.
Knighton became defensive when resident Doutrich cited his spotty attendance record. Knighton said he is “looking to change jobs” to be able to attend all meetings. Later in the meeting, he explained that he had sometimes participated in meetings via telephone.
Klawitter suggested getting in contact with Strickler. “Somebody needs to call the director of operations and sit down and have a conversation with him,” he said. “Somebody needs to communicate, because there seems to be a void of communication. You’ve got two camps, but nobody’s talking.” Kay Leader responded, “This is a public meeting, but he’s not here, and we’re not allowed to know, apparently, why he’s not here.” She said the situation seems secretive.















