Author: SPY

Dozens of visitors enjoyed the Route 441 bypass walk-through this afternoon, and it’s been a long journey to the road’s completion.

According to Borough Councillor Jim Smith, PennDOT officials told the Columbia Business Alliance in 1990 that it would take 25 years for a bypass proposal to move up its project list and come to fruition. The goal was to eliminate truck traffic through town, after business leaders identified that as a major concern.  For decades, a continual barrage of trucks had rumbled through Columbia, following Route 441 to the lower end and points beyond. In the process, residents had routinely been disturbed, automobile traffic disrupted, and foundations of centuries-old historic buildings shaken.

In a year-2000 update, PennDOT said it would take 15 years for the project to continue up the docket – in line with its previous prediction.

Today, November 1, 2015, with only a week or so until completion, the project is essentially a reality.

“This is a good day for Columbia,” Smith said today.

Smith said the project gained momentum after State Senator Mike Brubaker and State Representative Dave Hickernell threw their weight behind it and helped make it a priority.

He added that others were also influential in seeing the project through: Lancaster County Commissioner Craig Lehman, former Columbia Borough Manager Norm Meiskey, Public Works Director Ron Miller, Council President Mike Beury, and several councillors, including Mary Barninger and Kelly Murphy.

Sometime in the future, a section of the Northwest River Trail running alongside the bypass will connect with the northern section running through Marietta and beyond.  Currently, county officials and LCSWMA are negotiating with Norfolk Southern for the tract of land between the two sections.

Set clocks back one hour tonight . . .

Today . . .

At Columbia Borough Council’s October Meeting of the Whole, Code Enforcement Officer/Supervisor Jeffrey Helm explained some of the workings of the codes department. Helm defined the purpose of a recent “courtesy notice” process – a reminder issued for a first time minor property issue to save clerical costs and time. He described it as more of a communication tool than an official notification. The form is a template containing a time-frame for corrections, which Helm claims residents appreciate, because it allows time for rectifying problems. He reported a 60-70% compliance rate, which he deemed “very successful.” Council noted that the current ordinance may have to be changed to include the courtesy notice.

Councillor Kelly Murphy noted negative feedback about the borough’s current rental registration program and asked Helm for an assessment. Helm characterized the program, which monitors 800 buildings, as “a monster,” because it consumes clerical time, especially from May to September.  He added that although the third-party inspection process is not ideal, the system works overall.  Helm said he reads every report received from the 8-12 certified inspectors contracted by the borough, and for violations, a “notice of violation” letter is sent. If a property is not brought into compliance, the owner can lose his or her license.  Properties that meet code requirements are registered for a fee of $100 per building.

Helm reported that since July 31, 50 landlords with at least one property each are currently delinquent in completing the rental registration process due to lack of a deficiency-free inspection report. Although landlords have been issued 30-day notices, most of the properties are currently being occupied without a valid certificate of occupancy. Councillor Mary Barninger emphasized that 50 landlords’ properties have been out of compliance for nearly 90 days – 60 days past the first 30-day notice. Helm blamed a bottleneck in the system, which he said is logistical rather than clerical. He cited as an example properties that are sold without notification. He also said inspectors sometimes cannot complete inspections due to occupants’ personal possessions blocking windows, receptacles, and other areas. An inspection order contains a disclaimer that the inspector will not move anything. He said it is impossible to do a thorough investigation. Helm added that many municipalities do not have a rental registration program or certificate of occupancy requirement.

Councillor Murphy recommended that council review the current fee schedule, especially fees for non-compliance. “We seem to be very kind and generous,” he said. “There are a lot of things we could be doing.”

In response to a citizen comment, council noted that Columbia Borough currently does its own restaurant inspections. Council said it is considering transferring that responsibility to the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, which would perform inspections at no cost to the borough. Currently, inspections are done at the borough’s expense.

Council reiterated its plan to add a full-time codes position, the title of which is yet to be determined.

Council also announced the resignation of Thomas James Millhouse, whose employment as part-time code enforcement officer was approved on December 22, 2014.  Sources tell the Spy that Millhouse submitted a ten-page resignation letter outlining various concerns. The employment of Code Enforcement Officer Robert Osborne had been terminated previously, effective August 10, 2015.