Columbia School Board reverses decision – almost!

The Columbia School Board almost reversed course Thursday night when they rehashed a motion from the previous night’s meeting.
At issue was how a vacancy left by Leo Lutz, Jr. in December would be filled. Resident Frank Doutrich had filed paperwork with the court to fill the vacant seat since the board had not made an appointment within the 30-day time frame. During the special meeting Wednesday night, the board had voted to table any motion for a vote pending the outcome of a judge’s decision. At Thursday night’s regular school board meeting, however, President Keith Combs revisited the issue. “I’m looking to make a determination as to whether or not the board can proceed with a vote on the candidates that were interviewed,” he said.
Board Director Kathleen Hohenadel pointed out that the board had voted to table the action the previous evening, until the judge’s decision. “We can’t just go ahead and appoint someone now, because it’s a very specific motion tabling until a very specific time,” she pointed out.
But Combs persisted, asking for comments leading to a motion to take the previous night’s action off the table.

Board Director Iris Garrido read from a law stating that if a vacancy is not filled by school directors within 30 days, the court of common pleas can intervene. “It’s up to the courts,” she said. “It’s not in our hands.”

Nathan Saxton, acting as the board’s attorney, said no official notice of action by the court had been received. “Our office has not received any notification or service of a petition being filed, so it’s our position that to our knowledge, there’s no petition that has been filed with the courts that would preclude the board from having any jurisdiction over the appointment of the vacancy,” Saxton said.

Garrido explained that the reason the board had decided to delay a vote was due to Doutrich’s petition and the judge’s confusion over what to do with it. Garrido then asked Doutrich, who was present, if he had a copy of the petition with him. He replied he had had it at the previous night’s meeting but felt he would not need it at this meeting, since the board had declined to accept it when he offered it the night before.

Doutrich also told the board he was aware that the district solicitor had been talking back and forth with the judge. He also said that Director of Operations Tom Strickler had made a comment indicating there had been communication with the judge. “So this is in the making,” he said.

Saxton then reiterated that under the present circumstances there was nothing precluding the board from acting to make an appointment.
“I’m not going to break the law because you’re telling me to break the law,” Garrido told Saxton.

Saxton said that the court would have the authority to vacate any appointment made by the board if the petition were found to exist and appoint the person the board deems most fit. In the absence of that, the board appointment would stand.

Hohenadel said, “I just think the cleanest way is to stick with the motion from last evening that it’s tabled. I would hate for us to appoint somebody and then have them pulled back out of that seat because the judge vacated them.” She advised the board to wait for the judge’s decision.

Hohenadel asked Saxton if anyone in the attorneys’ office had had any communication with anyone on the district prior to Wednesday night’s meeting.

Saxton replied that he was informed of allegations that the petition was filed but stressed that he had not seen it. “I was informed from somebody in my office that the district had related somebody claimed a petition was filed,” he said.

Hohenadel chided Saxton. “We as a school board came in last evening, and we hadn’t heard any of this, so if there was communication between your office and the district office, I would’ve hoped there would have been from there some upward communication to the board at some point in time,” she said. “There’s nothing more embarrassing than coming into a public meeting – and people presume that we have information that we don’t. It hasn’t been shared with us.” Hohenadel then asked Doutrich to submit copies of the petition to the school district on Friday, which he agreed to do.p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 36.0px ‘Times New Roman’} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px} p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 36.0px ‘Times New Roman’; min-height: 42.0px}

January Students of the Month

(Students in photo are not necessarily in order of names below.)


CHS Students of the Month:

Emily Stephens – Grade 12
Ciara Arroyo – Grade 11
Madison Simpson – Grade 10

Breanah Mitchell – Grade 9
MS Taylor/Hill Campus Students of the Month:
   
Kayloni Costello – Grade 8
Shayla Barley – Grade 7
Kiera Brown – Grade 6
Kirsten Resch – Grade 5 
Park Elementary School Students of the Month: 
Lillian Ross – Grade 4 – Mrs.Redding 
Jeinelys DeJesus Colon – Grade 3 – Mrs.Cellucci 
Sophia Carson – Grade 2 – Mrs.Aston 
Alexis Droege – Grade 1 – Mrs.Herr 
Nevaeh Davila Reyes – Kindergarten – Mrs. Winters

Columbia man gets 5-12 for hitting, killing cyclist en route to see dying father

A Columbia man convicted of a vehicle crash that killed an Upper Milford Township man last February was sentenced Thursday in Lehigh County Court, according to The Morning Call.

Frank N. Snyder Jr., 38, was reportedly sentenced to five to 12 years in state prison by Judge Maria L. Dantos for the fatal hit-and-run on Feb. 23.

MORE:

http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/columbia-man-gets—for-hitting-killing-cyclist-en/article_d037b6ba-df5a-11e6-a174-bfcca9a513e8.html

Resident confronts school board with legal action over vacant seat


The Columbia Borough School Board had expected to fill a vacancy at a special meeting Wednesday night but ended up tabling the move due to legal action taken by a resident. 
During the citizen comments section of the meeting, resident Frank Doutrich announced that he had filed a petition at the Lancaster County Courthouse to claim the seat vacated by Leo Lutz Jr. on December 9, 2016. According to court documents, Doutrich’s petition was filed with the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas on January 9 of this year due to the vacancy not being filled within 30 days.
“The school board did not fill this within 30 days,” Doutrich told the board. “According to the letter of the law, that was my next step, and I did everything right according to the letter of the law.” Doutrich added that he paid a $164.25 filing fee.
Doutrich also said that the school board’s attorney had interceded on the matter with a judge at the courthouse. “If you check with your attorney, he’s going back and forth with the judge. I know that for a fact,” Doutrich said. “Somebody else here knows what was going on.”

(NOTE: Columbia Spy has learned that Michael Grab, attorney for the school board, has asked Judge Dennis Reinaker of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas to dismiss the petition, claiming that it is “unverified,” further naming it a “purported petition.” Grab claims he has not seen the petition. Grab also states that the 11 signers of the petition are taxpayers but believes it is not valid, based on various statutes. He claims that the board may appoint a new board member after the 30-day deadline.)
Doutrich told the board that the matter is no longer under its jurisdiction, because it is under review by the judge. He said that on the advice of his attorney, he was there to explain why he would not be participating in the interview process. “This is in the hands of the court,” he said. “This is out of the hands of the school board.” 

Doutrich said he had originally submitted a letter of interest on January 3 regarding the vacant seat – within the 30 days.  He asked why nothing was discussed regarding the position at the January 5, 2017 Committee of the Whole meeting. Board President Keith Combs replied that he was not at that meeting. Doutrich then asked why the position had not been filled within the 30-day period. Combs said interviews were scheduled once the board had applicants, after the January 5 meeting. At that meeting, the board made no announcement about the vacancy or that interviews would be scheduled after the 30-day deadline. Doutrich said that after the meeting, he had asked three school board members if there were any candidates for the position and was told that no one had been so informed.
At the conclusion of Doutrich’s comments, Combs decided the board should proceed with interviewing the only other candidate present, Jenna Irene Geesey. Afterwards, Combs said that even though Doutrich did not participate in the interview process, he was still a viable candidate “for voting purposes tonight.” 

Board Director Kathleen Hohenadel advised the board that they would be better off tabling the matter until the judge renders his decision, because the petition is still in process. Hohenadel then made a motion to that effect which was seconded by Vickie Anspach, but before a vote could be taken, Director of Operations Tom Strickler interjected: “Your solicitor has told you to proceed tonight.  At the direction of the president, the solicitor did get back to Keith and told him to proceed with the interviews tonight, so that’s your decision.” A roll call vote was then taken, and the motion to table passed unanimously.

This issue was further discussed at Thursday night’s regular board meeting.
MORE TO FOLLOW.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 14.0px; font: 24.0px Times; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 14.0px; font: 24.0px Times; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000; min-height: 29.0px} span.s1 {font-kerning: none}