Author: SPY
About Town 1/13/19
(THIS IT)
Commercial Burglary | Columbia Borough Police Department
Columbia Borough Police are investigating a burglary of SPARROW Websites located in the 500 Blk. of Cherry Street in Columbia Borough, Lancaster County, PA between January 11, 2019 12:00 pm and January 12, 2019 4:25 pm. Unknown person(s) forced entry into the office and stole numerous items. The company is a website design company. Electronics, expensive photography and computer equipment were taken at the time of the burglary and the estimated loss is approximately $4,500.00. The perpetrators took the surveillance camera, however the camera automatically uploads to a cloud based storage online. Police are in the process of obtaining the footage and checking the area for local residential and commercial surveillance. Anyone with information in the investigation of this burglary please contact the Columbia Borough Police Department at (717)684-7735 or text LANCS to 847411 for tips.
Saturday, January 12, 2019
Case Status:
Case Type:
https://lancaster.crimewatchpa.com/columbiapd/10552/cases/commercial-burglary
ANNOUNCEMENT: CITIZENS MEETING SUNDAY, JAN 13, 3 PM, 500 CHESTNUT
LNP Editorial: $8-9 million River Park Project
Columbia couple erased debt by moving into a tiny house
Downsizing their home in Columbia, Pa., was a surefire way to knock out a good chunk of debt by reducing their mortgage payments. They had talked about living in a tiny house for years, and “realized it would fast-track our ability,” Claudia says. “When we sold our big house, we saved $156,000.”
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/couple-erased-156000-debt-moving-tiny-house-235502464.html
Councilman berates Facebook commenters in bizarre late night rant
Columbia Borough Councilman Cleon Berntheizel recently indulged in a late night/early morning Facebook rant, insulting commenters, and in some cases, calling them names.
Berntheizel made the comments early Friday morning on the Columbia Spy Facebook page under an article titled “Council president addresses tax hike and petition drive in prepared statement.” He has since removed most of his comments – and in a few cases offered meek apologies to individual commenters – but as of this posting, some remain on the Spy page. Most commenters are Columbia Borough taxpayers.
Berntheizel made the comments from his personal Facebook page, and in some remarks appeared to be speaking for Council. It is unclear at this point whether or not his comments were sanctioned by Council since our emails to council members and the borough manager have not elicited any response.
District Attorney's Office warns Columbia Borough about possible Sunshine Act violation
Council President Kelly Murphy: “Citizen comments, agenda items only. We have two sign-ups. The first one is Sharon Lintner.”
Sharon Lintner: “I want to talk to agenda item 10b: Advertising the 2019 budget. November 1st the last budget meeting that wasn’t the last, because then you put an extra one in November 7th. So when we arrived at the November 7th budget meeting, council president Murphy, you did say that there had been a 6-1 vote taken and you had already somehow found the money between the first, November 1 meeting, and the next meeting Nov 7 to fund the position for property inspector. Can you tell me who the no vote was on that? That was a private vote so we don’t…”
Murphy: “Umm, it was a personnel decision, does it matter?”
Lintner: “I don’t see how that can be personnel if…what exactly was the vote for again?”
Murphy: “Whether or not we wanted to continue, whether we wanted to move forward with hiring the person.”
Lintner: “With hiring the person or funding the position?”
Murphy: “Funding.”
Lintner: “So how – if they were – I still don’t understand how that’s personnel if the candidate hasn’t been hired or the position hasn’t been funded. It can’t be a personnel issue until after the voting, right? If you can’t fund it, how can you hire them? So should that vote have been taken in private?”
Murphy : “Yes.”
Lintner: “Ok, all right, so you’re not going to say who it was. It differs from the vote for him October 8th at the council meeting. At the public meeting, it was unanimous and then it was 6-1, so in four weeks someone changed their mind about either funding it or hiring him, but you’re not going to say why or how.”


















































