Month: July 2015
An extension of occupancy for a condemned building?
Is this building safe for occupancy or not? If it is, why has this notice been posted? If it’s not safe, then it should be condemned immediately and the tenants moved to another property at the expense of the landlord. An unsafe structure won’t necessarily abide by arbitrary dates.
Part 2 – Resident alleges selective enforcement by codes department
(For Part 1 of this story, go HERE.)
At last Monday night’s Columbia Borough Council meeting, Gerald Maurer of 518 North Third Street read to council from a prepared statement outlining his complaints regarding the Columbia Codes Department. Maurer stated that he was cited for violations even though he was not told by code officials what codes he was violating. He further asserted that code officials had not inspected the projects supposedly in violation – a kitchen addition and a deck atop it.
“To this day, nobody has shown me any codified documenting of written code that I am violating,” he told council. He added that he was initially informed in a telephone conversation with the codes office that no permit was needed for the project.
Maurer said code officials told him the deck is not strong structurally and does not meet code, even though they did not specifically cite which code. Maurer also alleged that code officials refused his repeated invitations to inspect his property. He further claimed that the codes department often does not conduct its own inspections, despite its $300,000 a year budget (according to Maurer), but instead sends work to another agency, Commonwealth Code Inspection Services in Manheim.
Maurer said a search warrant was issued for his property after he had appealed the violation. When he questioned why the citation was not held in abeyance until after his appeal was completed, he said he was told by a borough official it was because he had not paid a $600 fee to file the appeal. Maurer said he had received no notification of such a fee.
Maurer also accused one code official of stating “an outright lie” on the affidavit of probable cause. He also said he observed the official trying to break into the rear of 516 North Third Street.
Maurer informed Columbia Spy that he has recently received an email from Andy Nelson, of Commonwealth Code Inspection Services, informing him that he has until July 27 to pay any fees associated with the permit before any action is taken up with the borough attorney “to compel compliance.” If payment is not made by then, the borough could fine Maurer $500 a day, every day, since each subsequent day of non-payment would be considered a separate violation.
It's time to take a serious look at school consolidation
Here's an interesting read: City Must Pay Blogger $200,000 For Illegally Banning Her From Filming
“This settlement sends a powerful message that government officials cannot shroud their operations in secrecy by barring truth-telling video,” said Gerry Weber, lawyer for Tisdale, on aboutforsyth.com. “But more, the lawsuit has unveiled decades-old practices of an entrenched City government that has left its citizens in the dark. The Mayor’s actions were a blatant violation of citizens’ constitutional rights to record public meetings.”
GO HERE FOR MORE ON THIS STORY.
















